Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Sloper\s+\&\s+Tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Sloper\s+\&\s+Tower\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Sloper & Tower (score: 1): Author: "Gene Bigham" <jbigham2@kc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:13:47 -0600; Merry Christmas to all, and to all, antennas at new heights! I have been playing with EZNEC, which is dangerous since I really do not know what I am doing. But here is what I have gotten so far. I ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00713.html (8,835 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Sloper & Tower (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:34:39 -0800; Merry Christmas to all, and to all, antennas at new heights! I have been playing with EZNEC, which is dangerous since I really do not know what I am doing. But here is what I have gotten so far. I ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00714.html (10,947 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Sloper & Tower (score: 1): Author: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:29:02 -0600; While the gain you report is totally crazy, indicating some sort of gross error, the current distribution is not unusual at all. What I found when I played with slopers (1/4 wave) on 160/80/40 was th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00778.html (9,342 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]