Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Sloper\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Sloper\s+Question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: k2fr@juno.com (Fredrick R. Gern); Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 19:00:25 EST; Seems this is a good place to ask tough questions: Moved and reinstalled my tower. It is Rohn 45. On top is a Force 12 C3 (works great, but can't get 12 & 17 down w/tuner). That's not the main proble; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00609.html (8,891 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 07:45:07 EST; Since the only metal in the near field is the sloper and the C3, it's probably interaction between them. Lower the sloper and see what happens to the C3 SWR. Power up the C3 and rotate it while watch; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00611.html (8,945 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 21:13:15 -0600; A few years ago, I removed the storm damaged TH6 from my 70' tower and replaced it with an A3 that had been sitting at 40 feet, below it. I could not get a suitable SWR (i.e., <2:1) on my 1/4-wave, h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00618.html (8,608 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:36:38 -0700; Hi Tom, I have only a few comments to add. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... (K2FR's description of non-functional sloper) Then Tom replies: This is true given the way most amateurs approach the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00630.html (13,942 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 19:03:31 -0500; Hi Eric, You seem to be saying by choosing the proper attachment point, the tower radiates and the sloper does not. Since the sloper has to carry exactly the same common mode current as the tower, pe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00633.html (9,180 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:36:02 EST; Interesting thread - tnx, guys. This begs the question of using guy wires for slopers - an occasionally used technique. Am I to infer that their performance is more a matter of lucky placement than s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00638.html (8,102 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 08:33:03 -0500; Hi Steve, The best antenna is one that makes the user happy, no matter how it really works. With a few misused terms that sound official, like "critical coupling" or "radiation resistance", an antenn; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00640.html (9,365 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:34:25 -0500; just a couple of comments. I have a complete model of my one-tower installation and all the antennas and guy wires. It isn't totally accurate (for example, the lower halves of the dipoles in my lazy-; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00642.html (9,977 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 14:58:59 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> No. Just that the tower radiates and this is more important (and certainly more useful) than the radiation from the sloper. Unfortunately, we are talking in generalitie; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00651.html (12,990 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Sloper Question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:49:28 -0700; Yup. Pretty much. 73, Eric N7CL To: <towertalk@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQU; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00657.html (8,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]