Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Small\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Small\s+Antenna\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Small Antenna (score: 1): Author: cunhalopes@mail.telepac.pt (Joao Lopes); Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:50:52 -0000; For now I don't have much space. So it's all down to the M5AB from C.C. and the MQ-2 and MQ-4 from TGM. Seems like the C.C. M5AB has no gain on 12 and 17. Anyone out there tryed this minibeams? Any h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00110.html (6,944 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Small Antenna (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:29:34 -0600; Have you looked at the Force 12 C3S and C3SS? These are full size 2L beams for 10/15/17 with separate DE and Reflector for each band. They are VERY good small antennas with better gain and bandwidth; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00121.html (7,273 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Small Antenna (score: 1): Author: thorh@worldnet.att.net" <thorh@worldnet.att.net (Thor Hallen); Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:07:38 -0800; Joao: I used a MA5B for about 6 months and replaced it with a Force 12 C3SS. As near as I can tell, the MA5B performed as well as the C3SS and is much smaller. The MA5B has a trapped dipole element f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00145.html (8,643 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]