Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Smaller\s+Towers\s+on\s+City\s+Lots\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 08:32:51 -0500
A couple of years ago, Steve K7LXC, presented a paper at Dayton about smaller tower installations (for contesting and DXing) on city lots. I missed the presentation because the lure of the flea marke
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00600.html (8,656 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:41:57 EDT
On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 08:32:51 -0500 Lee Buller <k0wa@southwind.net> writes: Here's what I'm using: Rohn FK2548 48' foldover (25' x 25' guying pattern) $1400 Single Guying Kit $300?? Philly Top guys $3
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00609.html (9,396 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Lee brings up a point that I think applies to many of us of this reflector. Steve K7LXC material is a great starting point and although we have limitations many of us have competed quite well over th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00612.html (12,750 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: w6go@quiknet.com (Jay O'Brien)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:54:37 -0700
On the subject of towers on rectangular lots: You can get guying distance for taller towers by using four-way guying rather than three-way guying. Guy to the property line on the "long sides" of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00616.html (8,790 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 14:23:51 -0500
Ok, I started this thread, so I will jump into it too. You guys have to promise not to laugh to loud. Promise? Well....OK.... I have 60 foot or 25G up in a yard of concrete, guyed to elevated guy pos
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00617.html (11,059 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: DavidHarper@tx.slr.com (DavidHarper@tx.slr.com)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 15:13:43 -0500
I must again show my ignorance and ask what may be a dumb question, but I am now a homeowner (well, I will be in 29 more years :-( ) instead of a renter. Can guy anchors be placed all the way to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00619.html (9,422 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 16:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Here is the best small lot antenna system: 70 ft crank up tower TH-7 at top Cush 40-2CD 12 to 15 feet above that. one sloper at 66 ft. fed at top for 75 meters and slopering down at 45 degrees. One t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00621.html (9,201 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 18:01:35 -0600
You would be better off matching the TH6 Boom (gamma or omega match) as a rotary dipole for 30/40 meters or putting a loaded rotary dipole above the TH6, parallel to the elements (the boom is end loa
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00626.html (8,850 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 17:50:48 -0600
Add another tribander at 35 to 40 ft for even more versatility. They can be fed as a stack or turned to two different directions. Sometimes the lower antenna will even be stronger than the taller one
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00627.html (10,106 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 21:33:16 EDT
On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 14:23:51 -0500 Lee Buller <k0wa@southwind.net> writes: K1VR: You might consider the idea which surfaced earlier this year from N4KG, which is to gamma rod feed the boom of the TH6
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00631.html (9,242 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:47:01 EDT
Very different questions are involved. Your relationship to your utility easement is best learned by reading the utility easement. I would guess, however, that you can put a guy anchor on the near si
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00633.html (9,517 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 21:07:55
I've read the thread on this....but who can testify that it really radiates a signal on 40 that is worth while? Lee k0wa@southwind.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00634.html (9,645 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: K7NT@aol.com (K7NT@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 01:15:06 -0400 (EDT)
<< Here is the best small lot antenna system: 70 ft crank up tower TH-7 at top Cush 40-2CD 12 to 15 feet above that. one sloper at 66 ft. fed at top for 75 meters and slopering down at 45 degrees. On
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00636.html (8,884 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: bhorn@netcom.com (Bruce Horn)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:31:10 +0100
I live on a 50 x 125 ft lot in Los Angeles (a half-acre lot sounds like an estate to me). Here's the current antenna setup (all on one tower): Tower: U.S. Tower HDX-589 with 18 feet of mast out of to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00645.html (9,832 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Smaller Towers on City Lots (score: 1)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 11:34:49 -0400
My situation with relation to guying is this: The setbacks for inground guy anchors are the same as for any other building structure--6 feet off the side or rear yards. The fact that the anchor is s
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00648.html (9,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu