Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Solenoid\s+or\s+Binocular\s+configuration\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:23:48 -0400
I'm feeding a half sloper for 160 on the 100 ft tower. I've fed it direct which worked just fine with no apparent RF on the feedline. However I'm adding a current choke just to be sure and changing f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00345.html (8,487 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:36:13 +0100
Roger, Interesting question! I just tried a measurement using four FT240-31 cores - all I had spare in the component draw. I wound 9 turns of RG-400 on a stack of four cores. The CM impedance peaked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00346.html (8,382 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:09:01 -0700
For a ferrite choke with close-spaced turns, it does not matter if he cores are together or separated. What matters is the number of turns and the number of cores. The inductance increases with the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00349.html (8,176 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:51:10 -0400
On 10/21/2012 6:09 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/20/2012 7:23 PM, K8RI wrote: My question is about the difference between the 6 cores stacked or two stacks side by side. For a ferrite choke with close-s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00351.html (10,217 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Townley <nx7u@nx7u.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:04:38 -0700
I've measured this on several occasions, and have consistently found that the "binocular" format has significantly more distributed C than the solenoidal/toroidal format. Therefore the impedance peak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00352.html (7,650 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l@att.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:16:19 -0400
On 10/21/12 10:51 PM, K8RI wrote: On 10/21/2012 6:09 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/20/2012 7:23 PM, K8RI wrote: My question is about the difference between the 6 cores stacked or two stacks side by side
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00356.html (10,647 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:14:56 -0400
On 10/22/2012 9:16 AM, Mike wrote: On 10/21/12 10:51 PM, K8RI wrote: On 10/21/2012 6:09 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/20/2012 7:23 PM, K8RI wrote: My question is about the difference between the 6 cores
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00359.html (11,462 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu