Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Spammed\s+by\s+Tea\s+Party\s+mailing\s+from\s+M2\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: wyc <wycpublic@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:50:36 -0700
I was disappointed to receive an unsolicited mass-emailing last night forwarded from Mike Staal, K6MYC of m2inc.com (addressed to Ken Holladay K6HCP, but apparently bccd to me and others), re Prop 10
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00526.html (7,366 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: Harry Herr <w6hh@hughes.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:29:22 -0500
I'll put up with the spam if it helps to get rid of the Obamanistas! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00535.html (8,411 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:05:34 EDT
I'll put up with the spam if it helps to get rid of the Obamanistas! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PLEASE NO POLITICAL CRAP ON THIS REFLECTOR! Nobody ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00536.html (7,741 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:10:50 EDT
Seriously? W6HH, this isn't the Rush/Glenn/Sean reflector. Pull your pants back up, and DON'T PUT THIS CRAP on this reflector. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 7/25/2010 4:47:14 P.M. Central Dayligh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00537.html (9,509 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:43:30 -0400
Are you sure that the email really came from M2? It is pretty easy to spoof someone's email address. I was disappointed to receive an unsolicited mass-emailing last night forwarded from Mike Staal, K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00540.html (8,426 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "Frosty" <frosty1@pdq.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:00:10 -0500
Gee guys don't wear your feelings on your shirt sleeves just hit the delete key that is what it is far. Going off on some one like you have done is not correct way to do it. take a chill pill. and yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00543.html (11,304 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "Dino Darling" <dino@kx6d.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:27:50 -0700
Mike's stock just went up (if it could get any higher than it is already) with me! However, I doubt that Mike would use his company's e-mail list in this manner. Dino - KX6D I was disappointed to rec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00549.html (9,546 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:52:51 -0400
Another mail list infected by angry old men! Another list that I unsubscribe from immediately. Neal K3NC _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00551.html (7,887 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:58:00 -0400
As a e-mail user since 1993 (using a 386/25 W3.1 PC) I get spam on occasion that appears to be from a friend or a supplier. A local amateur who happened to start a security company that was bought in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00552.html (9,476 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:59:44 -0700
My bet is it was spoofed or he was hacked. Usually that's what I am seeing now. It's also silly that two guys would publicly flame the second poster when: "It certainly took Mikes company down a notc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00553.html (11,614 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:21:13 -0700
You think anyone cares if you subscribe or not, I suppose it is that "angry old men Grandstanding mentality"?? --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00554.html (9,539 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:50:59 -0400
Here's a tip for those of you on Gmail who are tired of this: If you press the "m" button while reading a thread like this, it will "mute" the conversation and never place future messages on the thre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00555.html (10,508 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:01:33 -0700
It's actually worse than that. The original spam on the list was from the guy complaining. There never was a post from Mike on the list. This pretty much defines "trolling." Now can we get back to to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00557.html (13,167 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2 (score: 1)
Author: "Frosty" <frosty1@pdq.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:12:20 -0500
Jack after going and doing what you did I do believe you are correct. I never received that email. Charles F. Frost Frosty K5LBU frosty1@pdq.net It's actually worse than that. The original spam on th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00558.html (13,664 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu