Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+Distance\s+for\s+M2\'d\s+6m7JHV\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Rich Hallman - N7TR" <rich@n7tr.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:52:05 -0700
What would be a starting point for stacking 2 6M7JHV 6 meter yagi's? Thanks...Rich _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wirele
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00375.html (6,738 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:38:08 -0500
Half wavelength is standard for optimum coupling, or about 10 feet for 6 meters ((6*39.4)/(12/2)). Keith What would be a starting point for stacking 2 6M7JHV 6 meter yagi's? Thanks...Rich ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00376.html (8,833 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:39:15 -0400
At 08:38 AM 7/12/2004, Keith Dutson wrote: Half wavelength is standard for optimum coupling, or about 10 feet for 6 meters ((6*39.4)/(12/2)). Isn't maximum gain somewhere in the 5/8 - 3/4 wavelength
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00377.html (8,364 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:46:00 -0500
May be, but I have always heard 1/2. Anybody out there with experience? How does spacing affect take-off angle? Keith Isn't maximum gain somewhere in the 5/8 - 3/4 wavelength range? 73, Pete N4ZR The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00378.html (8,089 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:08:09 EDT
Max stacking gain for dipoles is 5/8 wavelength. Max stacking gain for yagis varies with boom length. For the 6m7JHV with a 30ft 8in boom length, stacking distance will be in the 25 to 26ft range. As
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00381.html (8,338 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:30:19 -0600
To see how spacing affects take-off angle, install and run the YT (Yagi/Terrain) software that comes on the CD-ROM with your ARRL Antenna Book. Basically, stacking couples two or more yagis such that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00382.html (12,755 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:14:19 -0700
At 11:08 AM 7/12/2004 -0400, TexasRF@aol.com wrote: Max stacking gain for dipoles is 5/8 wavelength. Max stacking gain for yagis varies with boom length. For the 6m7JHV with a 30ft 8in boom length, s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00383.html (9,270 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:25:45 -0700
At 09:30 AM 7/12/2004 -0600, Bill VanAlstyne wrote: To see how spacing affects take-off angle, install and run the YT (Yagi/Terrain) software that comes on the CD-ROM with your ARRL Antenna Book. Bas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00384.html (11,039 bytes)

9. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:56:43 -0500
I use 30 feet for 2 6el yagis on 24 foot booms... Works great! Chuck W5PR Half wavelength is standard for optimum coupling, or about 10 feet for 6 meters ((6*39.4)/(12/2)). What would be a starting p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00386.html (8,383 bytes)

10. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:02:34 -0500
Spacing does not really affect takeoff angle. Takeoff angle is totally dependent upon height above ground. If you have optimum spacing, the takeoff angle will be the same as an antenna mounted 1/2 wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00387.html (8,946 bytes)

11. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Mitchelson - N3JPU" <n3jpu@speakeasy.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:35:35 -0400
Check out this article on stacking 6M beams: http://www.uksmg.org/stack.htm I would also ask M2 for the spec on stacking this antenna. Their website says 25' max, they also talk about a 4 bay stack o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00388.html (9,727 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: David O Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:35:48 -0700
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:02:34 -0500 "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net> writes: You can download the free program YTAD, which helps to answer questions such as these at: http://www.arrl.org/qexfiles/ The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00389.html (9,457 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:18:22 -0700
You can download the free program YTAD, which helps to answer questions such as these at: http://www.arrl.org/qexfiles/ The latest version of this program, apparently much improved, is called HFTA. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00391.html (10,965 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:25:52 -0700
It's not the average of the two antennas.. Using HFTA I just ran a pair of 3element antennas for 20m over flat ground The main lobe for 30ft is about 30 deg for 60ft it's about 16 deg for the pair it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00392.html (10,849 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:33:17 -0600
In the Help file for YT v2.0 (probably not the very latest version, but anyway...), N6BV states, "YT's default values are a ground conductivity of 5 mS/m and a dielectric constant of 13, typical of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00393.html (9,741 bytes)

16. RE: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <steveg@mtaonline.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:53:13 -0800
K5GW is right on the money. A quick glance at the M2 webpage places the stacking for the 6M7JHV at: Stacking Distance, Max: 27' Wide, 25' High As someone else also pointed out, call M2 and speak with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00395.html (10,972 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:12:16 -0500
IMO, there is a wealth of good thinking behind this email. You have given me some great ideas. Thanks, Bill. Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00396.html (9,968 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:33:19 -0600
Jim has articulated a very interesting approach to the question of covering the range of elevation angles for 6M. I like the idea of retaining the enlarged aperture of two yagis for the higher take-o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00397.html (10,405 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:18:59 -0700
Its pretty simple to do in EZNEC, Bill. All you need to do is to model two yagis at the appropriate heights above ground, and then drive each one with a 1 amp current source. EZNEC lets you specify t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00398.html (11,174 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Distance for M2'd 6m7JHV? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:13:33 -0400
W5WVO wrote:>But how to model the effect of various phase shifts on take-off angle? Does anyone have a handle on that? I don't know of any software that is set up to do the math involved in this scen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00399.html (10,575 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu