Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+KLM\s+KT34\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+KLM\s+KT34\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking KLM KT34's (score: 1): Author: "Courtney Judd K4WI" <k4wi@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:22:38 -0600; I would be extremely interested in finding out the details pro/con on stacking KLM tribanders. I have a new KT36XA and two like new KT34A's that I am thinking about stacking together. I have the towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00386.html (7,259 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking KLM KT34's (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:21:56 -0700; details pro/con on like new KT34A's that I tower, coax and StackMatch with the two bottom this? Thanks and 73's Sounds like it should work fb. Since the XA's driven els will be behind the 34As' by ab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00398.html (7,915 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking KLM KT34's (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:57:11 -0800; I wouldn't assume that the phase center (which is what you're trying to adjust for here) of the antenna is co-located with the driven element, particularly in a directive beam, where there's a fair a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00400.html (9,361 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]