Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+Moxon\s+XM240\s+and\s+Kt34\/36xa\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+Moxon\s+XM240\s+and\s+Kt34\/36xa\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking Moxon XM240 and Kt34/36xa (score: 1): Author: k3mm@verizon.net; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:32:25 -0500 (CDT); Anyone have any feedback on thiis combination? I've got to rebuild my 402CD++ and thinking Moxon instead of conventional design. Have about 12 ft of vertical separation right now. Ty K3MM ___________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00097.html (6,603 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Moxon XM240 and Kt34/36xa (score: 1): Author: "Marc Wullaert ON4MA" <marc.wullaert3@telenet.be>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:41:38 +0200; Ty, I have rebuild my 40cd2 to a moxon. What a difference. -25db f/B in the cw portion. +- 20db f/b in to the ssb segment. (7080.-7.200) Swr 1:1.5 max I had the same combo about 10 years and the KT34; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00110.html (8,013 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Moxon XM240 and Kt34/36xa (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:45:58 -0400; I have used a 402CD and KT-34XA since the early 1980's. There is slight SWR change on 15 on the KT-34XA. The 402CD is mounted 9 feet above the KT-34XA. I have not attempted changing to a Moxon versio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00120.html (8,891 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Moxon XM240 and Kt34/36xa (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:15:22 -0500; I had a serious interaction between my XM240 and my C3 with about 13 feet of separation when I put them up. I ended up having to turn the C3 90 degrees from the 40 meter beam. It seems fine now. A fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00122.html (9,615 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]