Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+Opposite\s+Polarity\s+2\/440\s+Beams\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+Opposite\s+Polarity\s+2\/440\s+Beams\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking Opposite Polarity 2/440 Beams (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:47:09 -0500; If one were to stack a pair of Cushcraft A270-10S 2/440 beams how close can they be without negative interactions, please? I need one to be vertically polarized and the other horizontal. I will eithe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00002.html (6,952 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Opposite Polarity 2/440 Beams (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:39:20 -0800; An important quibble about the word "polarity" -- the correct meaning is describing the voltage reference for the signal in an electrical circuit -- what in the old days, before we knew better, we c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00005.html (8,015 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Opposite Polarity 2/440 Beams (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:56:31 -0500; You are correct, the term I should have used is "orientation", though I have to hope that the jokesters on this list do not take liberties and chase a rhetorical rabbit trail with that one! ;-\ -- T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00006.html (7,869 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Opposite Polarity 2/440 Beams (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:50:55 -0500; What is the probable result of strapping the booms of a pair of 2/440 combo beam antennas together with one set of 2/440 elements on the vertical plain and one horizontal? On first blush I am thinkin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00017.html (8,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]