- 1. [TowerTalk] Stacking quandry (score: 1)
- Author: w5kp@swbell.net (J. Kincade)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:56:26 -0500
- I have a C3XL (33' boom) at 80' on a 45G. It works like absolute gangbusters by itself (have yet to call anybody more than twice to get a comeback, and even twice is unusual), but naturally I'm greed
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00341.html (10,074 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Stacking quandry (score: 1)
- Author: n2rd@arrl.net (Rajiv Dewan, N2RD)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:42:56 -0400
- Based on my modeling experience (eznec) , getting the phasing right is a big deal. I recently stacked two 6m antennas. I modelled two indentical 5 element antennas on 19' boom, vertically stacked wit
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00343.html (12,027 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Stacking quandry (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O Hachadorian)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:49:58 +0000
- The WX0B web site has a procedure for adjusting the phasing of dissimilar antennas. It involves a dual-trace scope and test transmissions from a nearby ham. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ K6LL@juno.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00344.html (7,216 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Stacking quandry (score: 1)
- Author: ve3tu@rac.ca (Steve)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:20:33 +0100
- Hi Jerry, I am running a stack consisting of a Cushcraft x520 at 150 ft and a c31xr at 100 ft and a klm kt34 at 50 ft. I was able to get the phasing right by using a mobile rig parked about a 1000 ft
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00347.html (9,718 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Stacking quandry (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:52:07 -0400
- Jerry and all, The warnings are correct. The phase shift in dissimilar antennas (or dissimilar tuned antennas) is a big problem. Any prediction you will never get phase "correct" is not necessarily
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00368.html (10,871 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu