Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+tribanders\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+tribanders\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Gregg Seidl <greggk9kl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 07:16:10 -0500; Thinking about stacking a couple of tribanders. Top at 80ish feet and the lower one at 40-45 feet. Thoughts or comments? Gregg K9KL _______________________________________________ ___________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00021.html (7,153 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:29:16 -0400; About 25 years ago, I modeled this extensively, using TH-7s and C-3s as my antennas. I wrote an article in NCJ for July 1996 on my results, but unfortunately it is not available online. I concluded; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00022.html (8,432 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:30:25 -0400; PS - I wound up at 69 and 97 feet because of guying considerations on my Rohn 25 tower 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>. For spots,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00023.html (7,623 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: John Langdon <jlangdon1@austin.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:26:16 -0500; BTDT. 30 ft best compromise spacing for 20-15-10. Wider spacing may result in too many high angle lobes on 10. Will lower be fixed or rotable? 73 John N5CQ Sent from my iPhone _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00024.html (8,576 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Ron Hill <hamstuffbyw7nn@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 07:11:51 -0700; I had two 20M Mono banders at 160' and 110', on two seperate towers 100' apart and fed with a Stack Match. Worked great when I was contesting 10-20 years ago. Now have a T-10 at 110', and removing th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00025.html (9,923 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Tyler Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:44:44 +0000 (UTC); Depends on your terrain but 45 is pretty low. My lowest of 3 is at 36 and its not very useful except maybe on 10. I usually park it South to cover that direction and dont use as a stack. My top 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00026.html (10,014 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:14:06 -0600; I think I came up with 32 ft or read that. It could have been Pete's article. 30 ish feet is the sweet spot. W0MU On 6/20/2022 6:29 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: About 25 years ago, I modeled this ext; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00027.html (9,952 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:16:17 -0600; I have a 70ft tower. HFTA said that another beam at 40ft would really help with some angles to EU etc. I am in a depression. It was not my choice for radio but here we are :). I agree depending on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00028.html (11,352 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: George Skoubis <geo.skoubis@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:53:39 -0700; If you look at the jkantennas site they have modeling results from Mid-Tris stacked with 35 foot spacing. They may have more results that are not on the website. 73, George / W7GES __________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00029.html (12,302 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:24:08 -0400; In a stack a 45' high tribander should be useful, certainly better than no second tribander. Often you have to work around guy wires or other things on the tower, it is easy to model in EZNEC to see; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00030.html (8,418 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking tribanders. (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:24:37 -0400; I am not a HFTA user but I seem to recall that it does not calculate stacked yagi's properly. John KK9A I have a 70ft tower. HFTA said that another beam at 40ft would really help with some angles to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00031.html (7,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]