Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Station\s+Ground\s+\-\-\s+additional\s+ground\s+rods\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Station Ground -- additional ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:07:00 -0500
I can't find the message now, but I'm sure that somebody mentioned driving additional ground rods for the radio equipment. BUT (if I have understood the code correctly) the NEC requires all these gro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00617.html (7,499 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground -- additional ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Frank Donovan" <donovanf@erols.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:08:43 -0500
Alan, There's a very important reason for bonding multiple ground systems (for example, your AC entrance panel ground and your ham station single point ground) with low RF impedance conductors. You n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00623.html (9,814 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground -- additional ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:43:11 -0500
That is correct Alan. They do not care how long the connection is, just that it is connected. 73 Gary K4FMX Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS) wrote: I can't find the message now, but I'm sure that somebody menti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00626.html (8,797 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground -- additional ground rods (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:59:27 -0800
Yep.. and there's some requirements that all those grounds be bonded together with some minimum sized conductor, etc. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00627.html (8,589 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu