Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Steel\s+vs\.\s+Phillystran\s+guys\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:12:36 -0700
My plans are to put up ~134' R45G with the top ~93' being above an RTS rotating tower rotor with guy rings... antennas will be stacked thus the tower will be heavily loaded [we are in a 70 MPH zone h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00490.html (8,369 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:33:18 -0400
That study is on www.yagistress.com 73, Pete _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00491.html (9,610 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys... (score: 1)
Author: "Roger K8RI on Tower" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:59:46 -0400
I get "Invalid link" and "not found" for the above so I can not get to their study or conclusions, but I do have first hand experience with both EHS and Phillystran of similar ratings for comparriso
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00523.html (11,125 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:28:41 -0400
Sorry I passed along an outdated link - the correct one is <http://k7nv.com/notebook/towerstudy/towerstudy1.html> There are some other articles on that page that give numbers for the elasticity (not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00525.html (7,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu