Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Steel\s+vs\.\s+Phillystran\s+guys\.\.\.tower\s+failure\s+modes\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Steel\s+vs\.\s+Phillystran\s+guys\.\.\.tower\s+failure\s+modes\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys...tower failure modes! (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:44:40 -0700; in addition... while thinking about the conclusion of K7NV's tower stress analysis I wondered why I have never heard of a tower failing due to the BASE rupture or anything related to the base! If ind; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00493.html (7,873 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Steel vs. Phillystran guys...tower failure modes! (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera); Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:57:15 +0000; I think you're getting confused. The analysis shows that if the base is fixed or doesn't allow the tower to lean over, then there will be either a twisting moment induced into the tower, which will c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00494.html (10,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]