Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+40\/30\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+40\/30\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:23:36 -0000; I've pestered the boys at fluid motion enough on this topic. The present motor housing won't hold 33' of sprocketed metal strip. They'd have to retool for new molded housings. That's why the 40-6 Big; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00084.html (7,551 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:17:44 -0500; I'm not sure that's necessary... they could use a Hi-Q loading coil... this would work well since bandwith isn't the issue it is with a more conventional shortened 40... it wouldn't have to be much b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00092.html (7,463 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:43:03 -0800; At 04:17 PM 11/4/2003 -0500, Mel Martin wrote: I'm not sure that's necessary... they could use a Hi-Q loading coil... this would work well since bandwith isn't the issue it is with a more conventiona; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00094.html (9,018 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:57:28 -0800 (PST); For a 40/30 beam, you could make the elements 1/2 wave on 30 and use switched in loading coils for 40. The switches could select taps for phone or CW on 40. Rick N6RK ________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00096.html (7,990 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:37 -0500 (EST); My druthers would be for a 2 element 30/40M loaded SteppIR that would be 20M or close in size. I don't have much room, and am using a EF-140 (only by the sufferance of my neighbors) and 30M inverted; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00097.html (7,783 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:41:27 -0800 (PST); I've spoken to the team at Fluid Motion several times about 40 meter capable versions of the SteppIR. I've been told they are planning to have one available next year. They told me that it will most; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00117.html (9,228 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:30:07 -0500; ...add 16ft of wire on each of the your 3 ele stepper and you're on 40m. Folding the element does little to reduce the performance. It looks hokie, but it's simple, light weight, more efficient than; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00119.html (8,007 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:35:08 EST; To follow up on a previous post about 4 el vs. a stack of 3's. I change my answer to: a stack of 4 el steppirs with 40-6 coverage. Now THAT is something I would be willing to move outside town for :-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00120.html (8,150 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 08:48:26 -0500; At 08:35 AM 11/5/03 -0500, K3BU@aol.com wrote: You can have either 40 - 6 coverage in full size 40m el. (tough to do, but not impossible), or have 40 - 20 in shortened version, which is much more pra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00121.html (8,546 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: Jack <videorov@direcway.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:20:56 -0500; Stacked steppIR would be nice KZ4USA FREE Classifieds With Photo Gallery http://www.inkjetgraphics.com but Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00122.html (9,510 bytes)
11. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:11:05 -0800; No. A properly designed lumped inductance is better than linear loading. That's why many 80 meter Yagi owners have upgraded to W6ANR's aftermarket loading inductors, replacing the original linear lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00123.html (8,874 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: david jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:15:21 -0500; One could argue that bending the element 90 degrees does not have the effects you discibe as linear loading. Have you actually tried it? 73, dave wa3gin Richard Karlquist wrote: Folding the element d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00124.html (9,396 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 (score: 1): Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:03:32 +0100; Why not cotrol the boom lenght, same as the elements ? We are soon back to our geometric variable airplain Pete, remember ? What say ? Jos on4kj but Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00127.html (9,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]