Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Strength\s+of\s+rotating\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Strength\s+of\s+rotating\s+towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Strength of rotating towers (score: 1): Author: ChrisB@prism.co.za (Chris Burger); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:13:55 +0200; My rotating tower is now up and running, awaiting only a suitably heavy rotator. The bottom 17 m is stationary, with something like 29 m rotating above it. Right now, the top beam (20M4) is at 42 m.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00560.html (9,200 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Strength of rotating towers (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:33:51 -0800; Great question, Chris! Wish I had the answer. In the past when I have posed questions related to torsional limits of tower sections, they seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Most of the familar design; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00561.html (12,114 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Strength of rotating towers (score: 1): Author: ve3tu@rac.ca (Steve); Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:30:43 +0000; Hi Chris, if you look at Kurt Andress K7NV web site he has load analysis of different type tower base installations and guying installations. Your setup would be similar to a pier pin base. If you ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00567.html (8,209 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]