Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Subject\:\s+A\s+near\s+iminent\s+TX\-455\s+failure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Subject\:\s+A\s+near\s+iminent\s+TX\-455\s+failure\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Subject: A near iminent TX-455 failure (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:56 -0500; Did one of your notes mention a 22-foot very heavy mast with 3 feet in the tower? Does this overload the TX-455 -- especially with a 40 meter dipole on top? The 19 feet above the tower would seem to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00449.html (7,039 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: A near iminent TX-455 failure (score: 1): Author: EL34GUY@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:36:22 EST; I wondered that as well. Thats a lot of weight quite high above the tower. Mark W0NCL _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wir; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00451.html (7,034 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]