Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Sufficient\s+ground\s+or\s+counterpoise\s+for\s+VHF\/UHF\s+antenna\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Sufficient ground or counterpoise for VHF/UHF antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Zembower via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 18:39:31 +0000
Hello, all, and happy holidays to those that celebrate them! Rumor has it that I can expect a new VHF/UHF radio under the tree tomorrow. This will be my first VHF/UHF base station. In preparation, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00122.html (7,980 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Sufficient ground or counterpoise for VHF/UHF antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 13:08:08 -0800
Yes I know it's not the mass of a vehicle. The SWR is pretty good, I think. It goes from about 1.45:1 to 1.3:1 over the VHF band, and 2.5:1 to 1.3:1 in UHF (with a consistent set of big fluctuations
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00124.html (9,047 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Sufficient ground or counterpoise for VHF/UHF antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Gene Smar via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 16:20:05 -0500
Kevin:      Many thanks for the Christmas greetings and back atcha.      The first thing I would do is try moving the antenna and ground plane around to different locations in the attic.  The purpose
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00125.html (10,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu