Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T\-Match\s+versus\s+Gamma\s+Match\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T\-Match\s+versus\s+Gamma\s+Match\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] T-Match versus Gamma Match (score: 1): Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu); Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 09:45:52 -0500 (EST); I am interested in Frank, W3LPL's, arguements in favor of the T-match versus the Gamma Match. As I recall, the primary "advantages" Frank listed were 1) needed no series capacitor and 2) was used wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00295.html (8,756 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] T-Match versus Gamma Match (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 13:29:02 EDT; reactance. And only the half-element on the same side as the Gamma rod need be adjusted (shortened) to produce a match to 50- or 75-ohm co-ax. The only possible "disadvantage" would be mental, i.e.,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00303.html (7,734 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]