Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T2X\s+rotor\s+for\s+DB\-36\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T2X\s+rotor\s+for\s+DB\-36\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:42:25 -0500; Is a tailtwister T2X adequate to turn a DB36? The beam the guy is putting would be located just slightly below the top of the surrounding trees in a residential neighborhood so I dont expect the beam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00506.html (6,669 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:32:42 -0500; What would you recommend? Can I do it with a small RAK? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Kelly Taylor Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:44 AM To: Jeff; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00507.html (9,168 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 07:12:10 -0700; The DB-36 is not a small nor light antenna, 160 pounds and a 26-foot turning radius equates to 4,160 foot-pounds on the rotator, about 1,000 foot-pounds more than the spex on the T2X suggest. 73, kel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00508.html (8,474 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <jeff@ac0c.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:13:47 -0500; Is a tailtwister T2X adequate to turn a DB36? The beam the guy is putting would be located just slightly below the top of the surrounding trees in a residential neighborhood so I dont expect the beam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00510.html (7,378 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:44:57 -0500; Trees or not, I think Id be leery of using a T2X for a DB-36. The DB-36 is not a small nor light antenna, 160 pounds and a 26-foot turning radius equates to 4,160 foot-pounds on the rotator, about 1,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00511.html (9,012 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:23:02 -0400; T2X is hardly adequate with the basic 4 element 20-10 meter yagi. The boom is overly flexible and the constant motion really beats up a rotator. The "trombone" elements and longer boom of the DB36 ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00512.html (8,407 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]