Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TA\-33m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TA\-33m\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "George Yazzolino" <kc7hkp@teleport.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:36:04 -0800; hi Guys I am looking to buy my first beam antenna, I am going to be putting up a Rohn 25 tower and i have found me a Mosley TA-33M for $100.00 dollars it has been up for a few years and need cleaning; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00289.html (6,785 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "Frank Mayer" <domino@worldlynx.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:07:36 -0500; The Mosley is ok but they have come along way in antenna design since then. My choice would be a new Force 12 C3. Very compact and full size elements on all bands. You'll here about how well built th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00290.html (7,375 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: Ken Cechura <kcechura@umr.edu>; Date: 11 Dec 2003 11:22:23 -0600; OTOH, F12's customer service is crap. for the price, the mosely isn't bad. the force 12 is overpriced, and, as i said, their customer service is a JOKE. I waited THREE MONTHS for them to return an em; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00291.html (8,854 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:51:56 EST; on If you want to see actual on-the-air comparisons of some tribanders (including the TA-33 and C-3), read our tribander comparison report. Over a dozen tested. Available from <A HREF="http://www.ch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00292.html (7,764 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:59:11 -0500; At 12:51 PM 12/11/03 -0500, K7LXC wrote: IMO a hundred bucks for a TA-33 in not perfect shape is WAY too much. OTOH if you've got lots of time to refurbish it and you can get it for, say, fifty bucks; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00295.html (8,673 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "Frank Mayer" <domino@worldlynx.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:03:49 -0500; Hmmm. I called Force 12 with a question and Natan called back within 30 minutes with the answer while I was putting my C36XR together. The Force 12 and the M2 yagis of today outperform any of the yag; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00297.html (8,038 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:38:58 -0600; George: I used a TA33jr. slightly smaller and less power handling capability than the 33m for several years and worked something like 245 countries with it. I've got a Mosley 33 Classic WARC now, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00299.html (9,764 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Griffin" <jeff.griffin@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:45:05 -0500; RR on the lousy email customer service. I know as I had a Force 12 on order for over 4 months. I'm very happy it took so long, because SteppIR came out with a 4L, and I canceled my order. I then had; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00300.html (10,399 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "KD8OK" <kd8ok@n-focus.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:51:07 -0500; While the TA-33 isn't on a par with some of the new designs, just having something in the air that is rotatable will put you had and shoulders above the noise. You at least will be able to hear bette; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00301.html (10,018 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <w4foa@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:14:31 -0600; George, You will get a zillion opinions I'm certain, so here is mine, hi. While the price ($100) may be about the upper value limit, considering the condition of the antenna, you certainly can't touc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00303.html (9,798 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:18:13 -0500; Considering the hassle putting it up... and the problems possible with traps... and the fact I'm a little skeptical about it being up for 3 years... those antennas have been around since BC (Before C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00305.html (8,163 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:42:14 +0100; I own a FB-DX506 ( Fritzel ) The best one........... Amazing, not one of the venerable advisors told us WHERE , HOW , WHEN. Advice in general: ( not advise..... ) -Vendors: 7 X 7 = 51, today, 50 tomo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00310.html (10,112 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33m (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:33:06 -0500; Actually, blind fasteners are used on even the largest aircraft in areas where driven rivets or bolts are impractical. So long as the fastener has the required shear strength, there's no reason to av; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00366.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]