Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TH3MKII\s+vs\s+3\s+element\s+SteppIR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TH3MKII\s+vs\s+3\s+element\s+SteppIR\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Terrence R. Redding Ph.D." <terry@oltraining.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:04:42 -0400; I have a TH3MKII with a 30/17/12 dipole mounted five feet above the beam on a 54 foot Tri-Ex tower. I am thinking of replacing that with a 3 element StepIR. I am convinced it will be a step up in all; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00191.html (8,109 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:59:41 +0000; did you It's one antenna vs two. The boom is only 2 ft longer than the HyGain. Yes the elements are full size on 20, so a little more torque compared to the TH3 but you don't have the other dipole, s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00194.html (8,662 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:05:08 -0400; Terry - I'm not sure if you mean to leave the dipole up or not. Get the 30/40M driven element, and do away with the dipole, and add a band. Why do you care if it's bigger? Will it extend over your pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00195.html (10,156 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Terrence R. Redding Ph.D." <terry@oltraining.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:29:23 -0400; Mike, you raise a very good point. I was trading 12/17/30 for 12/17 and gain. But if I add the 30/40 trombone I get 30 meters back and add 40 meters to the top of the tower. Does anyone have any expe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00206.html (9,077 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:38:52 -0400; I added the trombone to a 3-el SteppIR. It works like it should. However, you might want to consider a little more mechanical support for the trombone element before you put it on the tower. The ends; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00209.html (8,277 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Terrence R. Redding Ph.D." <terry@oltraining.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:58:03 -0400; The biggest problem with bigger is the proximity of my tower layed over near the house. I originally laid it out to accommodate a cubical quad. When that went away in a hurricane I replaced it with a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00214.html (11,412 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:17:42 -0400; Terry - Proximity to the house is a factor, I'd agree. I can't picture your set-up, but I wonder if something like this would help. Pricey, but ingenious. http://www.nn4zz.com/tiltplate.htm I have th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00221.html (10,967 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] TH3MKII vs 3 element SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Terrence R. Redding Ph.D." <terry@oltraining.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:53:48 -0400; Mike, the bottom line is the reflector of the TH3MKIV hits the edge of the roof as I lower/tilt the tower. The SteppIR will be about four feet longer on a side, so much worse. The trombone would be e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00226.html (11,566 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]