Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TR\-44\s+rotors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TR\-44\s+rotors\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:55:08 -0700 (PDT); Does anyone on the list have experience or comments (good/bad) concering the CDE TR44 rotors? I know these are older unit, but would one relubed and such still work good for a small tribander? 73s Jo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00243.html (6,576 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:57:31 -0700; The only problem is, the TR-44 has no brake. Even a "small" tribander (usually) has elements that are 25-30 feet long which catch a lot of wind and make the beam "windmill." That can cause various ty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00244.html (8,398 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: Dennis Vernacchia <n6ki73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:08:34 -0700; I agree with Steve ( WB2WIK/6 ) .... hunt around for the Ham Series in a CDE/Hygain Rotator A used Ham M which is easily and cheaply rebuilt and re-greased would be the best least expensive bet - I h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00245.html (9,317 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:04:18 -0700; Dear OM. Although I had deleted your message and the single response I read. Decided to drop you a note as that person's experience and mine differ greatly. I had a TR44 up for several years in Orego; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00259.html (9,167 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "Michael Brown" <k9mi@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:58:46 -0800; I couldn't agree more with Steve on this one. I had a brand new CD 45 I used my TH3 and it lasted a little over a year before the potentiometer went out on it. You could just watch the TH3 moving bac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00260.html (9,764 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "Michael Brown" <k9mi@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:10:42 -0800; My TH3MK3-S manual shows 36 pounds. Not much over 28, but my CD 45 decided to break in the dead of winter, so that's why I went with a heavier duty rotator. As always, YMMV.... 73 - Mike K9MI _______; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00264.html (10,706 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: jpk5lad@cox.net; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:53 -0500; Hi John -- The TR44 does have a brake but it's a gravity type brake, not as effective as the wedge-type brake on the Ham M and up rotators. You can read about it on the first entry of this page on my; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00266.html (8,573 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:38:07 -0700; Hi John I had one of those on a 30 foot tower and a 2 el 20 meter monobander. Every time the wind blew, it blew the antenna which ever way the wind was blowing. Finally took it down and replaced it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00282.html (7,943 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] TR-44 rotors (score: 1): Author: "David Johnson" <jdavid1@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:29:20 -0400; Hey John, I have a CD44 that I'll give you if you are looking for one. I don't know if it's in working condition but I think it is. I don't have the face plate but those are available from Hy-Gain. Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00284.html (9,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]