Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TV\s+Channels\s+2\-6\s+Post\s+Transition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TV\s+Channels\s+2\-6\s+Post\s+Transition\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition (score: 1): Author: donmar1234@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:54:23 -0400; There are?20?Full Power TV stations listed for channels 2-6 post transition and many Low Power TV stations. You can download the list from the FCC here:? www.dtv.gov?? lower rhs of the page. 73, Don; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00331.html (8,450 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:51:10 -0800; Hi Folks! There are only two stations using channel 6 after the June cutover. Why are we not asking for a 4m band allocation, even with restrictions? Does anyone know the process of petitioning the F; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00333.html (10,774 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:24:51 -0400; Channel 6 is 80-88 MHz - not 70 MHz. 70 t0 74 MHz is allocated to non-broadcast use in the US. It is between TV channels 4 and 5 and would not be freed by the reduction of low band VHF stations follo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00337.html (13,460 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition (score: 1): Author: k7lxc@aol.com; Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:05:16 -0400; Why are we not asking for a 4m band allocation, even with restrictions? Does anyone know the process of petitioning the FCC? In other countries there is a 70.0-70.5 allocation and while participatio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00338.html (7,954 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:07:12 -0800; Hi Folks! We'll continue this on the two 50 MHz/6 Meter lists. The proximity to channel 4 is more relevant - my mistake! Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 --Original Message-- From: Joe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00339.html (14,644 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]