Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tailtwister\s+in\s+Universal\s+Top\s+Section\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tailtwister\s+in\s+Universal\s+Top\s+Section\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tailtwister in Universal Top Section (score: 1): Author: Dennis W0JX <w0jx@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:27:52 -0800 (PST); Gary, it will be an extremely tight fit and I would advise against it. I have had a Universal tower since 1977, first with a 60 footer, then 70 footer, and since 1998, an 80 footer. In all instances,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00339.html (8,260 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tailtwister in Universal Top Section (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:50:59 -0500; Wait just a minute. The top section simply puts SIDE support around the mast. There is NO twisting of the top section by anything above it. The ONLY twisting within that section occurs AT the rotor w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00340.html (9,073 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]