Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tall\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tall\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: barrie@centric.net (Barrie Smith); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:46:04 -0700; All this talk about towers swaying and toppling has roused my curiousity about how high is high. Amateur or commercial, what is a high tower, or which is the highest tower? TNX, Barrie, W7ALW List Sp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00192.html (7,881 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:18:00 -0600; W8JI has a 300 ft high tower with some 160M wire antennas on it. There are several 200 ft amateur towers, mostly at big contest stations like KC1XX, W3LPL, N4AR, plus others I'm sure, plus several 16; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00194.html (9,355 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net); Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 21:28:54 -0700; I've often wondered that myself. I know that they exceed 2000' guyed. I've got a 2k in site of my roof. And then there are the self supporting ones. I don't know how tall they get. Sutro is about 1k,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00195.html (8,291 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:34:03 -0500; FCC and FAA regulations tend to limit commercial towers to 2000' The FAA will, almost as a matter of course, find any tower greater than 1000' a "hazard to air navigation" and the FCC's ERP vs. heigh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00199.html (10,283 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: george.shaw@ukf.net (George Shaw); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:45:33 -0000; Ok this may seems a silly question but with all this talk of 2000' + towers it got me thinking. WHY does the height of the tower matter so much? Is it to elevate the antenna above the surrounding gro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00202.html (8,859 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 06:24:05 -0800; With all this talk of 300'+ towers, I seem to remember an FCC-imposed limit of 200' for amateur radio antennas. Don't remember if that's from ground level or above an existing building, or what. I do; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00203.html (10,686 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ka4inm@qsl.net (Ron KA4INM Youvan); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:54:25 -0500; Ideco-Dresser made several 1,200' self supporters, most survive today, they were put "in city's" on smaller lots than guyed towers. (several blocks square) These are black steel, not galvanized, jus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00204.html (9,976 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ka4inm@qsl.net (Ron KA4INM Youvan); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:09:59 -0500; It is to gain maximum distance. 1,649' gets you a 55 mile radius, in Florida where a high hill is 124 feet high. This is done in a few places, where it is possible, I have heard of Los Angles, New M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00205.html (9,552 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 10 Dec 2001 05:59:45 -0800; There's no "limit", per se, but 200 feet is an important boundary. Above 200 feet, or above an imaginary line (picture it as a sort of glide slope) that extends from an airport at zero-feet elevation; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00206.html (9,794 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 10 Dec 2001 06:25:48 -0800; What if there's no hill nearby, or the hill has no electricity, etc.? What's on the 300-ft tower you mention? 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00208.html (9,436 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:20:34 -0600; It's all about coverage area. The 3 major TV stations in Huntsville ALA have their towers on top of Monte Sano Mountain which is roughly 1000 ft above average terrain. The two on top are just under 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00210.html (9,528 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: wb4jvi@cslink.net (wb4jvi); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:29:47 -0500; i live near an airport and found this while researching how tall 'my tall' could be.....there is a java applet(TOWAIR button on the web site) that you can run to determine if you need to register you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00215.html (12,241 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:36:36 -0500; There is no height limit for amateur antenna Jerry, just a limit where paperwork must be filed with the FCC (and FAA) telling them "hey I'm installing a tower" and have them bless it. They send you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00216.html (8,797 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@concentric.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:47:00 -0500; Lot's already said on this part... Kinda necessary to have hills... Here in south Florida, the highest hill around is an expressway overpass. Flat as a pool table for hundreds of miles. So, We've got; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00223.html (11,312 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:45:06 -0600; Fellow TTers: I once stopped by a QTH in Houston to pick up a radio for a friend in Dallas and the ham that had been repairing it had a 6 element triband beam at 105 feet. He had no problem working a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00225.html (11,364 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:59:48 -0600; N4KG response below. As most readers know, I've been preaching that everyone needs BOTH High and Low antennas to cover ALL the angles supported by the ionosphere. IMHO, everyone would benefit by havi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00227.html (10,127 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:32:05 -0600; Tom: I got my first 250 or so countries with a little old Mosley TA33Jr. on top of 40 ft. of Rohn 25 (with a Yaesu FL2100B occasionally pumping out 600 watts) that just peeked over the top of the hil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00228.html (11,978 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:54:30 -0800; I wish that I could get one up 40ft. My mast for the loaded droopy dipole is about 21ft. WASed on 75m tho' Chrsi opr VE7HCB List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Tryl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00232.html (8,742 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]