Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Taming\s+an\s+80\s+m\s+beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Taming\s+an\s+80\s+m\s+beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Taming an 80 m beam (score: 1): Author: ChrisB@prism.co.za (Chris Burger); Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 20:27:36 +0200; When I started contesting in the early Eighties, even 40 m beams were not that commonplace. The few big guns who used them were LOUD--PY5EG, I2VRN and a few others. As they proliferated, my awe-struc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00513.html (12,468 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Taming an 80 m beam (score: 1): Author: ve3tu@rac.ca (Steve); Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:20:36 +0100; Hi Chris, your post is interesting reading and I can sympathize with your experience with tuning or should I say taming the Force 12 antenna. I had a similar experience with a C31XR where I had to pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00521.html (7,941 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Taming an 80 m beam (score: 1): Author: 74237.2073@compuserve.com (James W. Fisher, Jr.); Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:37:12 -0400; Chris, I've had my adventures with big antennas too. The tip of the iceberg of my adventures is covered in the Force 12 coverage and pix of stacks: http://force12inc.com/F12-STACKS.HTM Since I have s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00548.html (8,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]