Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telescoping\s+Tower\s+Coax\s+Routing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telescoping\s+Tower\s+Coax\s+Routing\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: Teddyer@aol.com (Teddyer@aol.com); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 05:16:07 EST; What is the preferred way to route and support the coax and rotator cables on a telescoping tower? I am installing a US Tower TMM-433SS (33 ft) tower. Thanks, Ted (WB2ACC) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00156.html (7,634 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com (KJ6Y@aol.com); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 17:29:23 EST; US Tower sells standoff arms to support the cables and keep the away from the tower. Coax arms are list as CX and the the number you'll need. One for each section, ie, 4 section tower would use the C; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00160.html (7,795 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan W6OLD); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 21:52:31 -0800; You will quickly find there are two near-religious camps on this issue. Just about everyone suggests using the manufacturer's standoff arms. The difference comes in regarding whether to physically s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00170.html (10,634 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:55:01 -0500; Me too. I found that this is the only method that works on the U.S. Tower tubular series if you want to be able to raise and lower the tower remotely. At the moment, I'm using cable ties and tape, v; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00355.html (12,075 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:25:00 EST; It's one of those things that we're working on. Appreciate your input. I wouldn't recommend using cable ties, though. The little square locking mechanism sticks out too much for my liking and it coul; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00360.html (8,617 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 10:08:17 -0500; locking coax and Actually, I just use cable ties to fix the coax to the top standoff, so the ties don't travel through the standoff rings. I tape the coax along the boom from the balun to the top st; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00366.html (10,774 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Telescoping Tower Coax Routing (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:29:44 -0800; I am also using an MA 550 (non-rotating) with factory standoffs, and have found that attaching the coax and rotor control cable to an eighth-inch steel cable with cable ties works well. I haven't had; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00381.html (11,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]