Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Temporary\s+Coax\s+on\s+the\s+ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Temporary\s+Coax\s+on\s+the\s+ground\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Temporary Coax on the ground (score: 1): Author: dw <bw_dw@fastmail.fm>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:13:05 -0800; I have two wire antennas. One is a classic 135' doublet up 55' favoring E/W The other is a 40m dipole I put up last fall which is slightly North-West facing.. for working JA(s) on grey-line. Since th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00479.html (9,941 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Temporary Coax on the ground (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:01:20 -0500; Try a choke in the coax just before the batching network. Use Jim Brown's (K9YC) RFI tutorial for the specifications. To me, it sounds like feed line pick up. 73 Roger (K8RI) On 1/28/2016 Thursday 4:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00484.html (10,539 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Temporary Coax on the ground (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:40:42 -0500; Er...MATCHING network! 73 Roger (K8RI) 73 Roger (K8RI) On 1/28/2016 Thursday 4:13 PM, dw wrote: I have two wire antennas. One is a classic 135' doublet up 55' favoring E/W The other is a 40m dipole I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00486.html (10,494 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Temporary Coax on the ground (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:13:41 -0500; So you have a doublet (which apparently is a dipole fed with ladder line) resonant on 80m and a dipole resonant on 40m. I would expect that the 40m dipole would be more efficient on 40m and hear more; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00526.html (8,231 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]