Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tennadyne\s+T\-6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tennadyne\s+T\-6\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tennadyne T-6 (score: 1): Author: wa4dou@excite.com (wa4dou@excite.com); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 19:05:30 PDT; Hi Again Gang, Considering one other antenna and would like to hear pros and cons on the Tennadyne T-6. Its attractively priced and has good specs for bandwidth and SWR, being a log periodic. Am a bi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00634.html (7,524 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tennadyne T-6 (score: 1): Author: wa4dou@excite.com (wa4dou@excite.com); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 19:05:46 PDT; Hi Again Gang, Considering one other antenna and would like to hear pros and cons on the Tennadyne T-6. Its attractively priced and has good specs for bandwidth and SWR, being a log periodic. Am a bi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00635.html (7,498 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tennadyne T-6 (score: 1): Author: b4e@earthlink.net (DavidC); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:08:14 -0400; the and You might also have a look at KMA antennas: http://www.qsl.net/w4kma/hf.htm they claim better specs ... though their price and specs compete with the T-8 rather than the T-6. I am wondering; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00637.html (8,163 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tennadyne T-6 (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:20:25 EDT; In reply for a Tennadyne T-6 Log Periodic opinion.......I've used mine now for almost three years- For an antenna on a 14 foot boom- it is amazing- I tested it for months against a TH3JR tribander an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00638.html (8,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]