Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Terrain\s+Effects\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Terrain\s+Effects\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Terrain Effects (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:37:05 -0800; Using tools like TA has anyone compared the effects of very close-in terrain to distant horizon clutter. Specifically which would be more detrimental to take-off angle, an HF antenna mounted directly; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00033.html (7,960 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Terrain Effects (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:06:27 -0800; To my recollection, HFTA does geometric theory of diffraction, in a 2D plane. So there is a big difference between a flat 3 degree slope and a 1000 ft high ridge 4 miles away. The key here is the siz; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00036.html (10,412 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Terrain Effects (score: 1): Author: "William Barney Stacy" <WStacy@uwyo.edu>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:03:44 -0700; It has been my experience that TA only works out to about 10,000 feet (slightly more than 10 Km). 73, Bill, K7EY _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Se; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00137.html (7,295 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Terrain Effects (score: 1): Author: "Michael Harris" <mike.harris@horizon.co.fk>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:47:17 -0300; G'day, <snipo> It has been my experience that TA only works out to about 10,000 feet (slightly more than 10 Km). <snipo> Err, maybe .... (slightly more than 3 km) Regards, Mike VP8NO ________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00160.html (7,453 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]