Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Thanks\:\s+Rasing\s+fixture\s+strength\s+replies\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Thanks: Rasing fixture strength replies. (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:48:13 -0400
All: Thanks for all the informaitve replies on the strength of the TRX80 raising fixture. The only "complaint" I recevied is that the structure tends to bow a little with the heavier masts and antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00363.html (7,234 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks: Rasing fixture strength replies. (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:45:02 -0700
Steve's (k7lxc) prime directive not withstanding (do what the mfr says), I think that Garry at U.S. Tower might be correct in stating "...the winch...should not be a problem"; However the real concer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00401.html (11,752 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks: Rasing fixture strength replies. (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:50:59 -0400
Al, Good point. I should have asked if there had been any rasing fixture failures. In Gary's defence, he said it should handle the load with no problem and then mentioned the winch capacity. I'm sure
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00404.html (13,323 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks: Rasing fixture strength replies. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:16:25 -0700
There's two basic "styles" of failure here. The simpler one is simply bending past the elastic limit. Grab a hunk of rebar, and carry it across the yard. It will flex as you carry it, but it won't "t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00405.html (14,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu