- 1. [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's. (score: 1)
- Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:15:13 +0000
- Super thanks to everyone who responded to my questions. Not only did I learn all about the pros and cons of antenna wire, not only did I get some fill-in-the-gap knowledge about radials, but as an ad
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00531.html (11,903 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's. (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:25:32 -0500
- I believe that an inverted-L is usually used as a space-saving option to try and approach quarter-wave vertical performance without using a quarter-wave of height, correct? Grossly paraphrased, the l
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00536.html (8,484 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's. (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:05:39 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** The horizontal part also helps make it more broadband in terms of SWR. A 30 or 35 foot vertical, whether center or base loaded is going to be very narrow. A mo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00547.html (7,677 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu