Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Balun\s+Blues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Balun\s+Blues\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 23:42:01 -0500; <a bunch of stuff snipped> I've burned up BN-86s and had problems with the W2DU type baluns. Come to think of it, over the years, baluns have been a dependable source of problems! I've finally given; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00050.html (8,691 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 11:09:19 EST; The main purpose for a balun as I understand it is to keep the feedline from radiating. It helps to get all of the RF out the antenna as well as helping to prevent RFI. I've had problems with the Hy; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00063.html (9,949 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 07:36:09 -0900; Steve: Your experience mirrors mine. The transformer type of voltage Baluns have caused a lot of trips up the tower. The coiled coax versions are somewhat better, but I've had several problems with i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00065.html (8,928 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 12:35:37 EST; Hi, Del -- One more comment on coaxial wound baluns: Cushcraft recommends them but cautions the user to only use RG-213. This is because winding the coil with a foam-dielectric coax may cause the inn; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00067.html (8,630 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 13:21:00 -0500 (EST); Geezz... I've never had a problem with any of the baluns at my place. I've used W2DU, Aztec, Bencher... No problem. Maybe I'm not running enough power? 73 Bill, W4AN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00073.html (7,686 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 14:12:51 -0500 (EST); The only thing not said this time around on baluns wound of coax is that previous posts said to wind them with the turns IN LINE, not bundled together-- i.e., like a coil. de K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00076.html (7,717 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:01:31 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --7377214D6FC97B7CB1D90550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, Steve, since it was the article posted here la; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00083.html (18,416 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:05:16 -0500; Obviously! 8-) -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00084.html (7,785 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:28:38 -0500 (EST); With all the reports of burned baluns, I now know why others win contests when I do not. I have run 1500 watts all day into my stuff at all kinds of bad swr's, and never burned out a balun. I now kno; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00088.html (7,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]