- 1. [TowerTalk] The big one (score: 1)
- Author: "Merlin-7 KI4ILB" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:09:21 +0100
- OK ...I am drooling. Is that a bad thing? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00743.html (6,383 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] The Big One (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 9:20:26 -0500
- RE: The Big One I am encouraged by Peter's comments having to do with terrain. Actually the antenna is 6 elements on a 110 foot boom instead of five on a 100 foot boom. On FLAT ground the antenna wou
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00770.html (10,623 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] The Big One (score: 1)
- Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:06:48 -0400
- That's quite the project that Stan has going ! I do have to ask one thing....If the primary objective is EU, couldn't the same effect be achieved with 2, 4 or 6 strategically-placed 140' Rohn 25 towe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00779.html (8,416 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] The Big One (score: 1)
- Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:20:08 -0500
- Steve, I don't have room for two towers and inverted V elements which would take the ropes out hundreds of feet to get an angle you could live with or four or six towers in order to achieve the resul
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00784.html (7,086 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu