- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:40:46 -0800
- I believe that I remember Dean telling me that it does not. I'm cc to him, so we'll find out for certain. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ ________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00195.html (9,058 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:06:12 -0500
- There is another limitation as well.... While K6STIs YO program allowed you to select from a list of stock antennas, or put in the actual measurements of your own, and THEN stack them, over ACTUAL te
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00197.html (12,297 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Morrison <junkcmp@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:34:22 -0500
- HFTA is useless if you dont also incorporate other station data during your analysis besides the info the program needs to function: 1-A list of bands you are planning to operate using horizontal yag
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00237.html (14,881 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu