Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tilting\s+a\s+beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tilting\s+a\s+beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tilting a beam (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 01:10:53 -0700; Hi All A friend of mine is in kind of a bad spot. There is a big hill just to the Northwest of him. When beaming in that direction, he beams right into the side of the hill. If he were to tilt his be; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00099.html (7,128 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tilting a beam (score: 1): Author: john@jrh.com (John Hunley); Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 20:25:14 -0500; ...which would lead to the question: If one were to design some sort of remotely controllable tilt mechanism (sorta like the "el" part of an az-el rotator), could one control the takeoff angle, and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00100.html (8,670 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tilting a beam (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 15:54:10 -1000; Because what controls the far field apparent "take off" angle is the height of the antenna above ground, and the ground conductivity out in the so called "fresnel zone". And this only works when the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00101.html (7,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]