Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+To\s+Choke\s+or\s+Not\s+to\s+Choke\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+To\s+Choke\s+or\s+Not\s+to\s+Choke\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:58:56 -0800 (PST); I have a LW/Inv L that I will feed thru an auto tuner at the base, with radials. Was wondering if I should bother with forming a coaxial choke (12-15 turns at 6" diameter) before it enters the shack; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00374.html (7,390 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:14:40 -0800; I coil of coax with no ferrite is a waste of coax -- it will look inductive, the rest of the line will look capacitive, and the result will be lots of feedline current. You DO want a choke on the coa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00381.html (8,064 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:54:50 -0800 (GMT-08:00); I've been seeing all these articles about the Palomar, Hy-Gain, etc. baluns and ferrite cores are not good, like they advertise. So who is it that sells these special "Fair-Rite" cores? --Original Me; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00385.html (9,621 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:47:32 -0800; Read the tutorial. Info in Appendix One. 73, Jim K9YC baluns and ferrite cores are not good, like they advertise. So who is it that sells these special "Fair-Rite" cores? ____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00394.html (10,422 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:49:11 -0800; The choke I've described IS a common mode choke, and far better than anything you can buy. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00395.html (10,002 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:15:55 -0800; I don't know whether they're good or not good. There's no question that some of the sellers with long-time ham reputations (Amidon, Palomar) are charging a substantial markup over the price from one; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00397.html (9,467 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Marlon K. Schafer" <ooe@odessaoffice.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:54:16 -0800; I have a repeater site at an FM tower site. For years it's been a problematic location for us. Recently however, it's gotten quite a bit worse. After nearly two weeks of massive problems we finally w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00399.html (12,186 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <baycock@hughes.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:19:12 -0600; Appendix One of what? Bill-W4BSG _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00401.html (8,485 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:31:40 -0800; Link in my earlier post in this thread. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00402.html (8,594 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:40:59 -0800; Study my tutorial. That's why I did the research to learn what I wrote! 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00412.html (8,702 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Marlon K. Schafer" <ooe@odessaoffice.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:02:55 -0800; OK, can do. Care to post a link to it? I missed the first part of this thread. Right now most of my time is spend dealing with that "stimulus" package. marlon ________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00416.html (9,436 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] To Choke or Not to Choke? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:08:28 -0800; In my first post in this thread. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00417.html (8,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]