Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+To\s+Rivet\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+Rivet\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] To Rivet or not to Rivet? (score: 1)
Author: sales@advantagecomm.net (Scott Bullock)
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 09:22:35 +0100
That is the question..... XM240 elements mostly assembled now-Anyone think of any drawbacks to adding an aluminum rivet to each joint along with the hose clamp? Just thinking it might make a better e
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00253.html (7,613 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] To Rivet or not to Rivet? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 11:16:44 EDT
Sure, knock yourself out. In fact, rivet it and throw the hose clamps in your parts bin. Actually I was very surprised to see that they are still using hose clamps since most new antennas are using r
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00257.html (8,159 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] To Rivet or not to Rivet? (score: 1)
Author: w2vjn@rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge)
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 09:30:43 -0700
in As we found out with the X9, which uses the same boom to mast arrangement, it would be better to completely assemble it on the ground and just insert the mast U bolts on the tower. The "cradle" i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00272.html (7,586 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] To Rivet or not to Rivet? (score: 1)
Author: dlhough@vegas.infi.net (dlhough@vegas.infi.net)
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 19:32:49 -0700
I'd like the opportunity to offer another opinion, if it matters any. We put up an X7. Looked at the "boom shelf", as Chushcraft calls it, arrangement and thought it a terrific idea both before putt
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00290.html (8,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu