Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+To\s+get\s+a\s+truly\s+balanced\s+antenna\s+feed\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:07:31 -0400
afraid the two-ammeters method is only the roughest of checks. Because it only measures the overall magnitudes of the currents in the two legs, it is only capable of detecting gross levels of unbala
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00361.html (10,011 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:57:59 +0100
Some readers may be interested in measurements made on a "real world" antenna - a 100ft doublet centre-fed with window-line. At the shack end of the window-line, the equivalent star-network impedance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00362.html (10,239 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:58:54 +0100
Some readers may be interested in measurements made on a "real world" antenna - a 100ft doublet centre-fed with window-line. At the shack end of the window-line, the equivalent star-network impedance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00363.html (10,156 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 17:02:19 +0100
Not sure if this link has yet been quoted in this discussion: http://users.tpg.com.au/users/ldbutler/Line_Diff_Long_Meter.htm Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00364.html (9,675 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:02:43 +0100
Thanks for the reference, Paul. 73 from Ian GM3SEK it it is legs. phase that he shows an _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mail
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00365.html (11,669 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:02:43 +0100
No, it hadn't - thanks, Steve. 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00366.html (11,304 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Edward McCann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:38:46 -0700
Thanks. The original paper notes since the unit is floating it can be used on each leg of open wire. Would this be as simple as connecting the two wires of the open wire feed to the uhf plug input? O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00367.html (11,190 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 07:48:19 -0700
Some readers may be interested in measurements made on a "real world" antenna - a 100ft doublet centre-fed with window-line. At the shack end of the window-line, the equivalent star-network impedance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00371.html (9,343 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:39:46 +0100
Jim, I'll need to dig back through my lab notebooks to see if I made measurements on other bands. A SPICE analysis shows that if you connected that window-line load to the output of an unbalanced tun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00372.html (10,508 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:02:26 +0100
Jim, Found a 10.1MHz measurement: Z1 - Window-line Leg 1 to Star Common: 13.7 - j41.1 Z2 - Window-line Leg 2 to Star Common: -2.6 - j84.8 Z3 - Star Common to Ground: 94 - j50 Even greater imbalance!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00373.html (8,964 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:50:55 -0700
Yes, Jim the math is the sticky part. However, it turns out that the way the Keysight E5071C works, is that you go to the Keysight site and download some "Visual Basic" software, and install it on yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00377.html (11,153 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] To get a truly balanced antenna feed (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:36:32 -0700
Actually, the reason is to minimize crosstalk between pairs by the mechanism that Neil Muncy (W3WJE, SK) called "shield-current-induced noise." He was describing it on shielded twisted pair where the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00385.html (11,806 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu