Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Top\s+loaded\s+tower\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Top\s+loaded\s+tower\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Top loaded tower for 80 and 160m (score: 1): Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 18:02:21 -0500; So...1/4 wavelength vertical on 80 meters, 65', and add top loading for 160 or 1/4 wavelength on 160 and try to figure out how to load a 1/2 wave vertical for 80m? The property I am buying has a humo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00114.html (7,307 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Top loaded tower for 80 and 160m (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 17:12:08 -0700; Been there, done that. For many years I have had a 90 foot vertical with 4 30 foot top loading wires sloping down at 45 degrees that resonate it around 1830. Without doing anything special, it will a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00115.html (9,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]