Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+vs\.\"\s+T\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+vs\.\"\s+T\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:17:01 -0500; W7RH wrote: Further with the T portion as top loading the feed point radiation resistance will be greater for a given vertical height. This when coupled with an excellent ground system of 1/4 wave ra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00160.html (8,180 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:18:48 -0500; Please disregard message below - sent to the wrong reflector - Jerry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00161.html (8,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]