Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+T\-loaded\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+T\-loaded\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: T-loaded vertical (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:29:16 -0500; Pete, You'll pretty much be required to model it to get any semblance of accuracy. The T will produce a more symmetrical azimuth pattern than an inverted L and will also do a better job of canceling; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-02/msg00101.html (8,740 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: T-loaded vertical (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:58:02 -0800; I agree with all of this advice, and it's how I matched my Tee. I did not use the ladder snaps, but I did make the vertical section two wires spaced with PVC conduit to increase the SWR bandwidth, an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-02/msg00102.html (9,321 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: T-loaded vertical (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:58:09 -0600; Good info Jim! I have wondered about this current moving technique. It has been a while since I had a 160m vertical, I used to cut the wire a little short and use a hairpin coil to match 50 ohms. Joh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-02/msg00104.html (9,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]