Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Base\s+Size\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Base\s+Size\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Base Size?? (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:02:05 -0500; Hello all, The plans for an LM-470 base call for a hole 3.5 X 3.5 X 7.5 Feet deep. (Aprox 3.4 yards). My question is, would a hole 4.5 X 4.5 X 7 Feet deep (Aprox 5.3 yards) be acceptable even though; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00244.html (7,403 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Size?? (score: 1): Author: "J.P." <jp@ezoom.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:12:13 -0800; Ted, the only person that can give you a definitive answer about this is an engineer with knowledge of your local soil conditions and what the overturning moment is for that tower at its rated capaci; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00245.html (8,124 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Size?? (score: 1): Author: "VE6JY Don Moman" <ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:34:04 -0000; If you have the proper soil for the original called for base, I'd say your alternate suggestion is quite adequate. I wouldn't loose any sleep over it. 73 Don VE6JY ___________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00259.html (8,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]