Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Concerns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Concerns\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: ae4mr@arrl.org (Dave Armbrust); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:01:21 -0500; Steve, Stop and think about what you are saying. You seem to be stating that this can be done in a couple of hours! For this two hour service Rohn charges $3,000 plus $300 per hour or approximately $; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00410.html (11,746 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:39:26 -0500; It has to be a really STOUT tall tower to support more than a rubber duckie. Some towers wouldn't even support themselves at 110 mph. Absolutely. There's no where in the country that isn't at least 7; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00411.html (10,892 bytes)
23. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:32:37 -0500; Hello Group, Bill said: "That's the one thing I realised after reading TowerTalk a couple of years. If you want to put a tower up right, it's going to cost you, but you'll end up with something that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00412.html (12,368 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: jamvet@bellsouth.net (Milcarsky); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:49:24 -0500; I have asked for and received much help from the members of this list concerning my planned erection of a tower at a new QTH some time this summer. None of that advice suggested that I cut corners to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00414.html (9,523 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:58:50 +0000; Just for curiosity, how many FLA homes can withstand 110MPH winds? I certainly wouldn't care if my tower stayed up, if the house didn't. There was a documentary on TV after the last big hurricane dow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00415.html (9,338 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: w5ba@compuserve.com (Gerald D'Entremont); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:36:54 -0600; Actually, all the back and forth on this caused me to go back and look at MY copy of the Rohn Ham Tower Catalog which shows a number of different scenarios: 1.) 110 MPH Basic wind speed ratings for e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00416.html (10,457 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:13:07 -0800; bracketed at 23 and 46 ft. levels). What I'm wondering is how many people have a house that will let them bracket a tower at 46 feet. Or even 23 feet. My house is a single level with the peak of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00417.html (9,331 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (bill wall); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:41:10 -0500; Hi all; The answer is insurance. The insurance companies put pressure on manufacturers. Ed, the tower erectors have their own engineers. They do not look at the manufacturers specs. They have better; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00418.html (11,243 bytes)
29. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@juno.com (rmoodyg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:39:27 -0500; What makes you think that the insurance companies will pay for everything anyway?? They wouldn't pay to save a tree that was partially blown over in Andrew, but would pay to have it removed. I saved; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00420.html (13,433 bytes)
30. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@juno.com (rmoodyg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:44:52 -0500; I disagree.. It's the product liability attorneys looking to make their fortune from the "deepest pockets". Forget the search for 'Truth'.. The only thing that matters is who wins. W4PJI On Tue, 16 J; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00421.html (12,565 bytes)
31. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:18:10 EST; hour! Okay, I didn't say that Rohn was going to do them or what they'd charge. No one that reads this reflector is going to pay $3k so that's not even in the realm of reality for us. My local PE does; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00424.html (10,376 bytes)
32. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:26:14 EST; Absolutely. The lowest windspeed in the TIA ratings in the US is 70 MPH. This is the same minimum used by many building departments. Many companies publish useable data but some rely on specmanship t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00425.html (9,561 bytes)
33. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:33:38 EST; As hams, we buy a tower based on what we think it'll support. Commercial buyers do just the opposite - they tell the factory what they're going to put on it and the factory tells them what they'll ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00427.html (8,882 bytes)
34. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:10:44 -0500; I looked at this too, in my catalog. I'd note that none of the 110 mph guyed designs in the Rohn catalog have more than 5 feet of tower above the top guy. Where as the 90 mph designs have 9 feet, and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00437.html (9,734 bytes)
35. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:21:08 -0500; I've managed to locate a place for a bracket at 25.5 feet. If I had a gable on the side or rear of the house, I could probably go 5-6 feet higher. Mine is a two-story, with a basement. Maybe these de; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00439.html (8,535 bytes)
36. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: wesandlinda@triconet.org (wesandlinda@triconet.org); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:10:58 +0000; "Fine Homebuilding Magazine" had an article that examined the failure modes of a lot of FL houses after hurricane Andrew. Some of the damage was precipitated (no pun intended) by the rain that accomp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00440.html (10,499 bytes)
37. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: n9rla@yahoo.com (Dan Evans); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:16:59 -0800; QSB is banned in Florida? Sounds like a pretty good place after all:-) Sorry, couldn't resist. 73 Dan Dan Evans N9RLA 2015 S. Jimtown Ln. Scottsburg, IN 47170 {EM78} 1/2 of the N9RLA /R no budget Ro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00443.html (9,801 bytes)
38. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:32:38 -0800; I wish someone would ban QSB here....it really gets in the way of working the DX <g> Sorry, couldn't resist. 73 de Terry KK6T -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00444.html (9,282 bytes)
39. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1): Author: ae4mr@arrl.org (Dave Armbrust); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:48:53 -0500; In a 110 MPH wind I will be up anyways! HI HI 73-- Dave Armbrust - AE4MR ARRL WCF Section Manager (941)378-1701 Fax: (941)929-0040 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00445.html (14,232 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1): Author: ae4mr@arrl.org (Dave Armbrust); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:17 -0500; What about all these self supporting cell towers going up all over the place. Are they rated for 110 MPH? They have some pretty good size antenna arrays at the top. Assuming 30sf at 200ft and 110 MP; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00446.html (9,456 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]