Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Concerns\s+continued\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Concerns\s+continued\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: mmurphy@n-focus.com (Mike Murphy); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:45:20 -0500; I have been watching this post for some time. I can't help but wonder if we are forgetting that an exterior wall of a house was never meant to take a lateral load, especially from 30 or 40 feet of to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00368.html (8,668 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:50:36 EST; No kidding! A guy down the street had his 25G housebracket lag bolted in with lag bolts that weren't even long enough reach the studs - ouch! Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00369.html (7,950 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: Tower2sell@aol.com (Tower2sell@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:28:48 EST; << I have been watching this post for some time. I can't help but wonder if we are forgetting that an exterior wall of a house was never meant to take a lateral load, especially from 30 or 40 feet of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00373.html (9,984 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: wesandlinda@triconet.org (Wes and Linda); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:33:59 -0700; You better damn betcha that the exterior wall of a house is designed to take lateral loads. If you're worried about that (XXX) MPH wind blowing against the tower and antennas what do you think is goi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00387.html (10,205 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 05:05:14 -0800; There was an article in QST a while back (its been several years) on house bracketing a tower which was coauthored by N1CQ, a structural engineer. As I recall the authors went to a great deal of trou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00391.html (9,619 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: Hank.Lonberg@Harrisgrp.com (Lonberg, Hank); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:18:30 -0800; Wes: Remember though the exterior walls are designed to take the load spread out over their full area, that is how the wind load is actually applies. The problem with bracket loads is that they are a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00394.html (10,963 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:16:42 -0500; Many years ago (statute of limitations has run - hi) I belonged to a ham club at a Federal agency in Washington that had a Mosley CL-36 on 20 feet of Rohn 25 tower. Because the government agency woul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00397.html (9,218 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (bill wall); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:21:00 -0500; Hi all; I was raised in a construction family when cement coated nails and kiln dried yellow pine was the norm. Now they use Canadian fir and spruce. The nails are staples. Not in a million years wou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00400.html (11,879 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns continued (score: 1): Author: wesandlinda@triconet.org (Wes and Linda); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:33:02 -0700; Hank, Agreed. I was just trying to point out that the blanket statement,"an exterior wall of a house was never meant to take a lateral load", is wrong. It certainly would depend on how well the brack; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00405.html (12,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]