- 1. [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation (score: 1)
- Author: "Roy Thistle" <roy.thistle@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:09:39 -0400
- Hi: I have some sections of tower (prob. heavy duty television tower) I want to use for small antennas (prob. a small yagi, and a vertical). These are much in use in this location by hams, and by peo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00022.html (8,322 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation (score: 1)
- Author: "Roy Thistle" <roy.thistle@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:02:25 -0400
- Hi: I posted a message about my tower foundation project. If anyone has any ideas, or suggestions, could they post a reply or email me at roy.thistle@utoronto.ca Thanks. r. __________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00135.html (6,756 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Tower foundation (score: 1)
- Author: Warren Wolff <warrenwolff@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:47:07 -0500 (EST)
- I was the victim of location and the time period where concrete prices had spiked. My foundation, 9 x 9 x 5 plus rebar and labor ran over $6,000. My tower is a AN-60HD. I am worried about the fellow
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00432.html (6,866 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower foundation (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:16:25 -0500
- Warren, It's a HG-70HD, and that's what the HG specs call for. I can't find anything in their docs about different soils tho. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ ___________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00454.html (8,107 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation (score: 1)
- Author: Chuck Smallhouse <w7cs@theriver.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:30:18 -0700
- I guess that I was somewhat fortunate, When I moved to Oracle (Pinal Co) AZ, I purchased enough land, 3.5 AC on a ridge to put up 7 ea, "antenna support structures" for which I applied for a zoning a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00036.html (10,514 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation (score: 1)
- Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:38:05 -0500
- This is the concrete equivalent of capping a tooth. The overlay is purely cosmetic and doesn't need to be part of the original pour which meets spec. Anyone see any issues with this? YES. You are was
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00075.html (7,408 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu