- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
- Author: "Marlon K. Schafer \(509-982-2181\)" <ooe@odessaoffice.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:27:10 -0700
- Nearly all of mine (50ish these days) are trade for service. Naturally the tower owner usually gets great service as he's right on the main backhaul to the tower :-). At the very least he gets a LOT
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00164.html (10,059 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:29:52 -0500
- Wowser... These are some cheap rents... Here in north Texas, the WISPs will pay the tower owner in the range of 5-10% of all revenue derived from that tower, free ISP service, and premiums on extra a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00165.html (11,138 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
- Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:07:58 -0500
- You know, I would consider doing a portion per month per subscriber, but no one has asked about it. I am more than happy to let a WISP get their start. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00166.html (9,531 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
- Author: "Marlon K. Schafer \(509-982-2181\)" <ooe@odessaoffice.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:04:21 -0700
- They must charge more than we do and/or have much lower upstream costs. Our company margin is only in the 12 to 15%. If I paid 10% of revenue on a tower plus the other stuff I'd be working for free!
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00175.html (12,839 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu