Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Permits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Permits\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:33:58 +0000; Lee: Consider yourself lucky, but not necessarily wise. My tower cost $3000 to install with crane services, concrete pumping, hole digging, and other expenses, and I wasn't willing to roll the dice a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00423.html (7,931 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:02:55 EDT; install with crane services, concrete pumping, hole digging, and other expenses, and I wasn't willing to roll the dice and take a chance of loosing that investment. If you try and ignore city codes a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00431.html (8,454 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: "Charles Mills" <w3yni1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:04:55 -0400; UNTIL the neighbors complained to high heaven and they realized I was out of spec on location...only thing that made me have to move it. Chuck -- == Charles L. Mills Email: w3yni1@gmail.com _________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00436.html (9,862 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:03:54 -0700; Around here (southern California), that would generally not be the case. There have been too many folks building or destroying something they shouldn't have, and claiming "oops", figuring that it's j; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00439.html (12,337 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:54:04 EDT; visually inspected for retro permits. It's one thing to do electrical work and the guy can see the new breakers, the new receptacles, etc.. It's another when he can't see the actual footings and reba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00440.html (8,122 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:09:17 +0000; When I did my permitted tower installation, the only inspection they did on-site was to take a preliminary look at the installation site, and determine setback compliance. I provided the US Tower dat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00442.html (10,264 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:27:33 -0500; Negotiate with your neighbors to use their 130 foot trees for your lowband wire 160 antennas, and agree NOT to sue if they fall down, in return. 73 Barry, W5GN _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00452.html (7,724 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permits (score: 1): Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:00:29 -0700; Which brings a thought: if you have difficulties/issues with zoning rules and neighbor concerns that necessitate setbacks from property lines, and fall radii, equal to or greater than your tower/ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00455.html (9,048 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]